data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/448ed/448ed3a37c8f253d0f08520a16001d80db35a936" alt=""
I ran the 3DMark06 benchmark three times and Nighthawk scored 9042 3DMarks on its best run, an improvement of only 11 3DMarks over its best score at a Memory Clock of 850 MHz. Here's the 3DMark comparison.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7d9c/d7d9ce76ecb06767b782ca890aabbb98117ce4a6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ac39/8ac392e6e53076830025ad89b517f142225488d6" alt=""
However, the performance benchmarks results using 3DMark06 were disappointing. My BFG 8800GTS running at 8800GTX speeds (Core Clock of 575 MHz and Memory Clock of 900 MHz) was unable to reach, much less, top its previous highest score of 9042 3DMarks achieved at a lower 875 MHz. Its results at the 900 MHz Memory Clock speed were: 8998, 9021, 9012, 9003, 9015 and 9018 3DMarks.
It is obvious that incremental increase in memory speed yields minimal, if any, performance improvement. When it comes to memory, I believe that better latency instead of faster clock speed contributes more to improved performance.
BFG Technologies now also has a BFG 8800GTX OC (Overclocked) graphics card which runs at a Core Clock of 600 MHz and a Memory Clock of 900 MHz. That's my next target. Will my 8800GTS hold up at these speeds?
No comments:
Post a Comment